Conversations with History: Kenneth Waltz
Posted on November 15, 2009 | 18 Comments
On this book of Conversations with History, UC Berkeley’s Harry Kreisler talks with eminent domestic scientist Kenneth N. Waltz, about theory, general politics, as well as a US purpose in universe affairs. Series: “Conversations with History” [6/2003] [Public Affairs] [Show ID: 7386] … Kenneth N. Waltz governing body universe affairs US
Related videos:
- Conversations With History: The Politics of Food Host Harry Kreisler welcomes bard Michael Pollan for the...
- George Lakoff: Moral Politics UC Berkeley highbrow of Cognitive Science as well as...
- The Body Politic: Immigration 2008 Immigration experts Wayne Cornelius as well as Gordon Hanson...
- Sebastien Tellier – La Ritournelle rule Love is to share, cave is for we...
- Milwaukee Men Walk a Mile in High Heels to Show Support Against Domestic Violence (FOX 6 Milwaukee) One out of each 4 women in the United States...
Comments (18)
Waltz could be more specific to the question about the new transnational terrorism and redefine his concepts on active unites. It’s time to update your theory Waltz!
where are the black guyus
you know how he divides political scientists in two worlds; the pioneer and a follower… I just thought he gave the intervewer a check…lol jk
The sound is aweful
Great! Kenneth RULEZ!
My god, I wish that Kreisler would stop with the “wha-wha-wha-wha-what i-i-i-i-is….” It is so distracting
Nive Vid Vary Interesting…….. Check out my Music vids
i hate his weezing lol, maybe my volume is too loud, but hearing that disgusting “im about to die cuz im fat, old, and unhealthy” really grinds my gears.
yeah, except states still might have interested in war for natural resources…other than that states would avoid war for the economics side…
he seems comfortable to me.
He doesn’t seem uncomfortable here…
His idea of anarchy is a lack of government. There is no supra-national government that is able to effect the behavior of a state. The UN has no teeth and has been shown to be ineffective.
The State is still supreme, though the nature of the game has changed. The military is no longer the primary way that states attain power, economic coercion has become increasingly important in a world where large scale conflict is avoided as much as possible.
I do not agree with Waltz about his idea of the anarcistic international political arena. As i see it the world politics is shaped around an hieracic system were the strongest states do help each other when one of them are in some kinde of problem. Just look at the whey strong economic states back eachother up in the negotiations whit the developing countries at the Doha conference. These summits do show that the further up the hierarcic system a state is placed the better for other strong state
I do not agree with Waltz about his idea of the anarcistic international political arena. As i see it the world politics is shaped around an hieracic system were the strongest states do help each other when one of them are in some kinde of problem. Just look at the whey strong economic states back eachother up in the negotiations whit the developing countries at the Doha conference. These summits do show that the further up the hierarcic system a state is placed the better for other strong state
interesting… but thanks to people like him i’m having a test on tuesday
very nice..interesting to see how he thinks
odd to see such a great mind so uncomortable in a social situation…or is it? i find that most great minds are socially akward. what do you think
nice