Harry How – Sports Photographer – Part 3

Posted on November 13, 2009 | 25 Comments

In Part 3 of a revisit with Harry, we get a deeper demeanour during a rigging as well as during a end, a full summation of ALL of a camera apparatus he uses. And if we wish to get in to this profession, compensate tighten attention. Go to photoinduced.com for some-more print info.

Related videos:

  1. Harry How – Sports Photographer – Part 2 As a sports photographer for Getty Images, Harry How...
  2. Harry How – Sports Photographer – Part 1 As a sports photographer for Getty Images, Harry How...
  3. Sex, Sports, and Caster Semenya Lauren McLaughlin’s shining blog entry: bit.ly Our village lives...
  4. Wii Sports: Bowling Power Throws Perfect 890 Because so most people suspicion my 890 was fake...
  5. Kasabian Football Hero Get a manuscript during Amazon – bit.ly An examination...

Comments (25)

 

  1. FreedomLovingGuy says:

    I likely call my lenses by the old lengths. Over time, we upgrade. I know there have been some minor changes, but who cares if it is a 70 or 80 to 200? It doesn’t make any difference. I know I have one of those, an 80 to 400, a 17 to 20 something, a 20 something to 70 or 80, and fixed length lenses – 8 MM f/2.8 fisheye, 16 MM fisheye, 14 MM wide, 24 MM tilt/shift, 35 MM t/s, 85 MM t/s, 85 MM f/1.4, 300 and 400 MM f/2.8. Of the latter, I KNOW the focal lengths, but the zooms? I know I am close.

  2. FreedomLovingGuy says:

    Yes. The files are much smaller. Who cares about storage? No one, really.

    HOWEVER, the cards download to the laptop much faster, and once the image is selected, and/or edited, it will upload to the mother ship MUCH faster. Since that is often a cellular connection, and sometimes satellite, it is important.

  3. Smorter says:

    Canon 580EZ? …. is the audio dubbed or something else?

  4. robshookphoto says:

    You can shoot at the same burst rate with raw. the burst just ends sooner because the buffer fills.

  5. TheHeroicWarrior says:

    The big lens didnt look that big untill he turned the lens cap around…

  6. popscrewlarry says:

    Jpg is much easier to send and upload. Generally images that are used do not have to be very large and generally end up B&W anyways. Also, when shooting sports, photographers shoot in 8fps+ bursts, which you can generally only do with jpg.

  7. azn1221 says:

    LOL random Nikon bag XD

  8. primeribs1 says:

    i dident know that.

  9. SteU4IA says:

    surprising to see majority of editors want images in JPEG format and not RAW..

    any one know why?

  10. rocket881 says:

    Regardless of how long they go, 1 spare battery for two bodies seems risky. I carry at least one spare battery per body. Usually one extra.. I can tell you that more times than I can count on one hand I’ve saved a fellow photog’s life by lending him a battery when his died. It earns huge points and really improves your reputation in the industry if you’re prepared and willing to help a fellow out.

  11. cratz1 says:

    I seriously have to point out how futile it is to nit-pick over the details. Nikon/Canon who cares? Also, who cares if it’s 80-200 or 70-200. You use it the same way. Maybe he got in the habit from an old 80-200 he use to have on Nikon, or whatever. Harry’s talking from a very practical point of view.

  12. JoostyBoy says:

    Yeah, lol! Nikon in Canon?
    Cool vid for the rest. interesting stuff

  13. RLTPhoto says:

    Good info but Harry needs to be sure about his gear, I hope he means a 24-70 2.8, 70-200 IS 2.8 and a 580EX flash

  14. GimliG35 says:

    Nikon bag in a Canon bag?

  15. HelleRita says:

    okay will try. Hoped he had a personal website *s*

  16. padraicleader says:

    google his name. you’ll find loads of his shots

  17. hit249 says:

    The truth isn’t fair then i guess…… sporting events in other countries aren’t as “nice and professional” as in America. American sporting events have a LOT more money invested in them. I am not trying to down anyone or any country just stating facts.

  18. HelleRita says:

    nice guy…
    Does anybody know where to see some of his pictures. I tried to look at Getty, but could not find out how to search for names…

  19. rdaef975 says:

    awesome.

  20. Tykell says:

    On a 1.3 crop it’s around 16 or 17mm. I think that’s what he’s referring to.

  21. butlerscabin2008 says:

    hes a legend,i have just bought a nikon 80-200mm af ed lens,does anyone know anything about it?as i got no instructions with it,

    cheers

  22. jo1337lol says:

    it’s actually a 15mm fisheye lens…

  23. Whatdididoo says:

    That is one monster of a lens!!!

  24. mattutubematt says:

    i second that! :D

  25. ReoPhoto says:

    I think that you have the best “what’s in my bag” video. Thanks for sharing!

Leave a Reply

Daily Show Comments

  • leocanemanEvatoman: The song is taken from adioswap, cause the old one was removed by the copyright owner.
  • welshyinoz: Nice clip, but what’s with the music
  • Ho0l1: no k.o
  • TrueMalka: this song is terrible…
  • dreadiroth: 1:57 … is he dead ? Doesn’t look too good !
  • phil367153206: Takanori Gomi.
  • leocanemanEvatoman: oh yeah very nice low kick
  • iDMS2009: Love that leg kick at 1:50, really digs the shin into the meat of the leg.
  • nickbullit: 2:38 ??? are there videos from that kind of fights ??
  • putisimas1: damn!!!!!!!!!
  • capital0341: 2:35
  • mesudmaffia: 0:23 Batista power bomp
  • Chibilein: He says “Das lässt sich sicherlich im Einzelnen widerlegen”
  • ulvi80: guter mann
  • loor: Welcher soll denn “schlecht” gewesen sein?